Cases 1 - 10 of 2,049
Haral v. Greene County Jail et al
as 6:2024cv03145
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Haral
Defendant:
Greene County Jail and Dr McGreevy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Smith
as 5:2024cv06063
Plaintiff:
Kenderal Rogers
Defendant:
Cassie Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dr. Moose et al
as 6:2024cv03140
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Moose and Nurse Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Manuele v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv04067
Plaintiff:
Jacob Manuele
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections and Monica Arce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Naylor v. Judge Wagner, et al
as 5:2024cv06047
Plaintiff:
Aaron L Naylor
Defendant:
Judge Wagner, Missouri Department of Corrections, Crossroads Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman-Bey v. Hendrickson et al
as 6:2024cv03128
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Coleman-Bey
Defendant:
Michael D Hendrickson, Michael L. Parson, Jeffrey Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adkins v. Lake Ozark Police Officers
as 2:2024cv04070
Plaintiff:
Kaleb Adkins
Defendant:
Lake Ozark Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Boone County Sheriffs Dept et al
as 2:2024cv04072
Plaintiff:
Ronald Elwood Brown
Defendant:
Boone County Sheriffs Dept, Dewayne Carey, Danielle Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mann v. Loveday et al
as 6:2024cv03130
Plaintiff:
James Mann
Defendant:
Loveday, Missouri Department of Corrections, Duryea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Richards
as 5:2024cv06046
Plaintiff:
Ashley Nelson
Defendant:
Todd Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
