Cases 1 - 10 of 1,383
RUBINOSKI v. ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al.
as 2:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
MISTER KENNETH RUBINOSKI
Defendant:
PA IG ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
BUTLER v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, SCOTT KLEINFELTER and MICHELLE IVICIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MAJOR v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
JOHN R MAJOR
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SCI GREENE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KREASHKO v. GILPIN TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2024cv00288
Defendant:
SOUTHERN ARMSTRONG REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT, GILPIN TOWNSHIP, GILPIN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
DENNIS KREASHKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
DAUGHTRY v. CEKADA et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
MARTIQUE DAUGHTRY
Defendant:
CO CEKADA, CO RANKIN, CO HERKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGINNIS v. HILL et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
VERN E. MCGINNIS, JR.
Defendant:
NURSE KAREN HILL, CHCA JANA JORDAN, NURSE KATE HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
COIT v. CLOSE et al
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CLOSE, PA DOC, SECRETARY LAUREL HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IYAPO v. FISCUS et al
as 1:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
AJAMU OLUSHEGUN IYAPO and ONDRE RICHBURG
Defendant:
ACTIVITIES DIRECTOR B. FISCUS, L. REEHER, FACILITY MANAGER R. IRWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KING V. SHAPIRO et al
as 2:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
SHAWN KING
Defendant:
PA GOVERNOR JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JACOBS v. ZAKEN
as 2:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JACOBS
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
