Cases 31 - 40 of 1,183,874
(PC) Nieto v. Allison et al
as 4:2024cv02628
Plaintiff:
Deputy D.A. Michael Nieto
Defendant:
Warden Kathleen Allison, Hernandez, Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Martinez, Jr. v. Pogue et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Joe Martinez, Jr.
Defendant:
Tyson Pogue, Jason Quick, Alva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv01278
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
Clayburne Williams and Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Dauwalder v. Atherton et al
as 1:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dauwalder
Defendant:
J. Atherton, J. Perez, Rostislav Davydov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Powell et al
as 2:2024cv01279
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
B. Powell, S. Arana and D. Caraballo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Azpera v. Campos et al
as 2:2024cv01285
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Azpera
Defendant:
J. Campos and G. Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manuel Orona v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00943
Petitioner:
Manuel Orona
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gordon (PS) v. U.S Parole Commission et al
as 1:2024cv01239
Petitioner:
Larry Gordon
Respondent:
U.S Parole Commission and Eric Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelley (PS) v. Stancil
as 1:2024cv01234
Petitioner:
Anthony Kelley
Respondent:
Andre Moses Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Troxler
as 1:2024mc00229
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Bureau Chief Shane Troxler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
