Cases 21 - 30 of 7,997
Rankin v. McManus
as 5:2024hc02051
Petitioner:
Shurod Rankin
Respondent:
Shawn McManus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cannon v. Bullard
as 5:2024hc02053
Petitioner:
Stephen Michael Cannon
Respondent:
Jamie Bullard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miranda Banos v. Locklear
as 5:2024hc02055
Petitioner:
Victor Manuel Miranda Banos
Respondent:
Dean Locklear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Beckham v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02052
Petitioner:
Kevin Eugene Beckham, III
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holland v. Shew
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Brandon Neal Holland
Respondent:
Chris Shew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Drake v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02085
Petitioner:
Omarion Drake
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. State of NC et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Respondent:
NC Department of Adult Public Safety, State of NC, NC Department of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Marshall Lee Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ezeah v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02083
Petitioner:
Ken Ejimofor Ezeah
Respondent:
Warden K. Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tvrdy v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02084
Petitioner:
Jarod Steven Tvrdy
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Black v. NCDAC
as 3:2024cv00391
Petitioner:
Martinez O. Black
Respondent:
NCDAC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
