Cases 31 - 40 of 7,997
Ransom v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02058
Petitioner:
Clarence Michael Ransom
Respondent:
Warden D. Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02081
Petitioner:
Ritchie Williams
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lutz v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02082
Petitioner:
Joshua D. Lutz
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. Rangel Gonzales et al
as 5:2024hc02079
Defendant:
Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent:
Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rangel Gonzales v. Rowe
as 5:2024hc02080
Petitioner:
Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent:
Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holland v. Ishee
as 1:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
Markas L. Holland
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arriaga v. USA
as 3:2024cv00384
Petitioner:
Angel Arriaga
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bynum v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02049
Petitioner:
Adrian Bynum
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grissett v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02038
Petitioner:
Richard Hugh Grissett
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Azar El v. Cabarrus County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00243
Petitioner:
Rashaud Hussem Azar El doing business as Jerimy Love
Respondent:
Cabarrus County Jail, Mike Downs, Angel Gonzalez and others
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
