Cases 1 - 10 of 24,492
Farmer v. Parris
as 3:2024cv00563
Petitioner:
Keith Lemont Farmer
Respondent:
Mike Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Williams v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Williams
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitaker v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00560
Petitioner:
Toby Whitaker
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02292
Petitioner:
Terry Reed
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. Vandyke et al
as 3:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Vandyke, FNU Brock, J Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01101
Petitioner:
Adam Lee Simmons
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ROBERTSON v. Shelby County Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv02290
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LASHEA ROBERTSON and Ronnie Lashea Williams
Defendant:
Shelby County Division of Corrections, Anthony Alexander, Mayor Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. Jones
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NELSON v. WARDLOW
as 4:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
BILLY JOE NELSON
Respondent:
JERRY WARDLOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luther v. Chochran et al
as 1:2024cv01100
Plaintiff:
Jayson Lance Luther
Defendant:
Chochran, Dorton and Obion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
