Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 91 - 100 of 157,024
Littlejohn v. Kalla et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff: Timothy Wayne Littlejohn
Defendant: Dr. Ajai Kalla, Dr. Tabernik, Dr. Henie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Estate of Joe Nathan James, Jr. v. Kay Ivey, et al
as 24-11273
Plaintiff: THE ESTATE OF JOE NATHAN JAMES, JR.
Defendant: KAY IVEY, JOHN Q. HAMM, TERRY RAYBON and others
FARNEY v. GEO GROUP
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff: ADAM C FARNEY
Defendant: GEO GROUP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez, Joseph v. Broward County Sheriff et al
as 0:2024cv60716
Plaintiff: Joseph D. Sanchez
Defendant: Broward County Sheriff, Keshondra T. Davis, Unknown Deputy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
McMillian v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00079
Petitioner: Christopher McMillian
Respondent: Sheriff Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Wiza
as 1:2024cv01884
Petitioner: Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent: Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lindsey v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00080
Petitioner: Kyle Jordan Lindsey
Respondent: Sheriff Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01885
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Wingfield v. Pham
as 1:2024cv01877
Plaintiff: Timothy B. Wingfield
Defendant: Angela Phams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Georgia Department of Behavioral Health
as 1:2024cv01878
Plaintiff: Christopher Jose Adams
Defendant: Georgia Department of Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?