Cases 91 - 100 of 69,118
Huston v. McNeil et al
as 6:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Huston
Defendant:
Unknown McNeil, Unknown Rajo, Brayn Callarder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bursten v. Christie Cannon Real Estate Group, Inc., et al.
as 4:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Hilarie Bursten
Defendant:
Christie Cannon Real Estate Group, Inc. and Christie Cannon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
White v. Gillespie
as 9:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
John White
Defendant:
LLoyd Gillespie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Altagrace Exume v. United Cargo Logistics, LLC, et al.
as 4:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Altagrace Exume
Defendant:
United Cargo Logistics, LLC, Alexys Figueredo and Alain Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Lumpkin v. Wellpath
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Lumpkin, Jr.
Defendant:
Wellpath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Garcia v TDCJ Director
as 6:2024cv00157
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
TDCJ Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Anderson County Jail
as 6:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Reginald Brown
Defendant:
Anderson County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robledo v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 6:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Robledo
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SiOnyx, LLC v. Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd. et al
as 2:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
SiOnyx, LLC
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Blount
as 4:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Jack B Blount
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
