Cases 91 - 100 of 12,857
Sanders v. Wellman et al
as 4:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Harold Donavan Sanders
Defendant:
Nicholas Wellman and Austin Esther
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Flintroy v. USA
as 3:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Kendrick Lamar Flintroy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Coffman v. Roby
as 6:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
Timothy S. Coffman
Respondent:
Amy Roby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hart v. Department of Corrections Kentucky et al
as 4:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Josie Samantha Hart
Defendant:
Department of Corrections Kentucky and Green River Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fugate v. Shelby County Detention Center et al
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
William L. Fugate
Defendant:
Shelby County Detention Center, Shelby County Detention Medical Department and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattox v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Mattox
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Thruston v. Grayson County Detention Center
as 4:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Karlchaze Thruston
Defendant:
Grayson County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Barthuly et al
as 5:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Harold Eugene Hayes
Defendant:
Brad Barthuly, Devin Nielsen, Alysta Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Triana-Ceballos v. Paul
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Triana-Ceballos
Defendant:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
James v. Warden, USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Crandall James
Respondent:
Warden, USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
