Cases 91 - 100 of 196
Gray v. Franklin County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2011cv00950
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gray
Defendant:
Franklin County Sheriff's Office , Estate of Jim Karnes , John Kashubeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. KERNS et al
as 1:2011cv00698
Plaintiff:
Billy Rogers
Defendant:
KERNS, MORGAN, WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez-Sanchez v. Sanchez et al
as 4:2011cv01255
Plaintiff:
Domingo Sanchez-Sanchez
Defendant:
Robert Sanchez, Frank Olivarez, Robinson de la Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. Abdalla
as 2:2011cv00503
Plaintiff:
Atropin Palmer
Defendant:
Fred Abdalla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. Craig et al
as 1:2011cv00379
Plaintiff:
Alan Frazier
Defendant:
Shane Craig, Michael Dotson, Joshua Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Warden, Pickaway Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2011cv00072
Plaintiff:
George Moore
Defendant:
Warden, Pickaway Correctional Institution and Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barkley v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 2:2010cv01182
Petitioner:
Dominic Barkley
Respondent:
Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Deresse v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution
as 2:2010cv01083
Plaintiff:
Dawitt N Deresse
Defendant:
Warden Ross Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Provenzale v. Department of Justice et al
as 4:2010cv02373
Plaintiff:
Anthony Provenzale
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Correctional Institute - Elkton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thigpen et al v. Reid et al
as 1:2010cv02260
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo J. Thigpen, Donte Booker and LaShawn Wells
Defendant:
Bob Reid and Cuyahoga County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
