Cases 91 - 100 of 65,885
Thomas Mucha, et al v. State of Wisconsin, et al
as 24-1720
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MUCHA, Shareholder of Buzz Energies Inc and DIANE K. MUELLER
Appellant:
JAMES D. LAMMERS, also known as JAMES D. KURTZ
Defendant:
STATE OF WISCONSIN, SHEBOYGAN COUNTY, WISCONSIN, RACINE COUNTY, WISCONSIN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Powell v. Jackson County Schneck Memorial Hospital et al
as 3:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
FAWN POWELL
Defendant:
Jackson County Schneck Memorial Hospital doing business as MAJESTIC CARE OF SOUTH BEND and MAJESTIC CARE OF SOUTH BEND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 117 Americans with Disabilites Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marleis Trover v. Craig Oglesby, et al
as 24-1733
Plaintiff:
MARLEIS TROVER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of DONALD D. GADDIS
Defendant:
CRAIG OGLESBY and DUSTIN KELLEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv04077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Chaplin v. Crowder et al
as 3:2024cv03055
Plaintiff:
William Chaplin
Defendant:
Ryan Crowder, Steven Snyder, David Greenwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
