Cases 91 - 100 of 84,204
Irvin v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01515
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Irvin
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Nineteenseventynine LLC et al v. ASR Group International, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv01525
Plaintiff:
Nineteenseventynine LLC doing business as Breakfast Joynt, The and Sublime Surprise LLC doing business as Hot Java
Defendant:
ASR Group International, Inc., American Sugar Refining, Inc., Domino Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Association of American Railroads v. Jacobson et al
as 0:2024cv01522
Plaintiff:
Association of American Railroads
Defendant:
Bob Jacobson, Paul Marquart and Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Parish v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01516
Plaintiff:
James Parish
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Behm v. General Motors LLC
as 0:2024cv01517
Plaintiff:
Michael Behm
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, OnStar, LLC and LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Dunaiski v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01520
Plaintiff:
Perry Dunaiski
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
