Cases 91 - 100 of 704
Suleymanov v. Winston Premier Logistics, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00810
Defendant:
Otabek Umarov and Winston Premier Logistics, LLC
Plaintiff:
Abdulfotikh Suleymanov
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Gallo v. Cigna Corporation
as 3:2021cv00760
Plaintiff:
Salvatore Gallo
Defendant:
Cigna Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Slocum v. Wickham Park Trust
as 3:2021cv00502
Plaintiff:
Pamela Slocum
Defendant:
Wickham Park Trust
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Awosogba et al v. Mendelson et al
as 3:2021cv00501
Defendant:
TRIBL Technology Group, LLC and Steven Mendelson
Plaintiff:
Brittany Vick and Josephine Awosogba
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gomez-Rodriguez v. Reddi Rooster Too, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00683
Plaintiff:
Alex Gomez-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Madalyne Keegan and Reddi Rooster Too, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hereford v. Tamale, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00656
Defendant:
Sergio Hereford and Tamale, LLC doing business as Acapulcos Mexican Family Restaurant & Cantina
Plaintiff:
Erika Hereford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Neal v. Specialty Cable Corp.
as 3:2021cv00497
Defendant:
Specialty Cable Corp
Plaintiff:
Brittney Neal
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rivera v. Cantina Sforza LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00679
Defendant:
Cantina Sforza LLC, Rizzi LLC doing business as Via Sforza Trattoria, Donato Sforza and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Rivera
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Walsh v. CareCo Shoreline, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00401
Defendant:
Helga Pfanner, CareCo Shoreline, Inc. dba CareCo and CareCo Shoreline, Inc. doing business as CareCo
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Walsh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stewart v. Lazy Dog Management, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00204
Defendant:
Lazy Dog Management, LLC doing business as The Ole Dog Tavern, Niall O'Neill, ChubbyLove, LLC doing business as Chubby's and others
Plaintiff:
Milton Al Stewart
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
