Cases 91 - 100 of 10,821
Decker v. Tulsa Housing Authority
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Troy Decker
Defendant:
Tulsa Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hartley v. Tubbs et al
as 5:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hartley
Defendant:
Cheyenne Tubbs, Scott Burgess, Ian Druce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beck v. LNU et al
as 5:2024cv00296
Petitioner:
Patrick Beck
Respondent:
FNU LNU, US Marshals and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00297
Petitioner:
Joe Wayne Johnson
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hooks v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00299
Petitioner:
Elzie Wayne Hooks, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sparks v. Gulickson et al
as 5:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Timothy William Sparks and Timothy William Schwanz
Defendant:
FNU Gulickson, FNU Bouche, FNU Goldey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00053
Petitioner:
Rodger D. Stevens
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. Morgan et al
as 5:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Michael A Campbell
Defendant:
Patrick Morgan and Unknown Named Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Youth and Family Services of Enid et al
as 5:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Ryan Lee Black
Defendant:
Youth and Family Services of Enid, Melissa L Blanton, Garfield County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Miller
as 4:2024cv00125
Petitioner:
Shannon Latarion Scott
Respondent:
Michael Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
