Cases 91 - 100 of 4,248
Demos v. State of Washington
as 3:2023cv05964
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. State of Washington
as 3:2023cv05988
Petitioner:
Bryce Anthony Jackson
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Clark v. Andrewjeski
as 3:2023cv06027
Petitioner:
Nicolas Aaron Clark
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Halfhill v. Haynes
as 2:2023cv01630
Petitioner:
Scott Lindsay Halfhill
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tapia v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv01531
Petitioner:
Jasmin Jetta Tapia
Respondent:
Howard C Barron and Colette S Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Faustino-Anaya v. Andrewjeski
as 4:2023cv05157
Petitioner:
Arnulfo Faustino-Anaya
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dammarell v. Coyote Ridge et al
as 1:2023cv03175
Petitioner:
Travis Lee Dammarell
Respondent:
Coyote Ridge, Benton County and Yakima County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cantu v. State of Washington
as 1:2023cv03162
Petitioner:
Ismael Cantu, Sr
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morisette v. State of Washington
as 2:2023cv01519
Petitioner:
Christopher Morisette
Respondent:
State of Washington and Rob Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Faustino-Anaya v. State of Washington
as 4:2023cv05153
Petitioner:
Arnulfo Faustino-Anaya
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
