Cases 101 - 110 of 2,272
FILING ERROR
as 1:2023cv00934
Plaintiff:
George Ramirez
Defendant:
Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Davis v. Dollar General Corporation
as 7:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Jody Davis
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Family & Medical Leave Act
FILING ERROR
as 3:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
Judith Quinonez
Defendant:
Tournesol Siteworks, LLC and Isiah Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
FILING ERROR
as 3:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Judith Quinonez
Defendant:
Gordon & Rees Attn: Cindy M. and Isiah Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Cormier v. Scribe Media, LLC
as 1:2023cv00647
Plaintiff:
Alyssa Cormier
Defendant:
Scribe Media, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2102 WARN Act (Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification)
Nichols v. Austin Bridge & Road LP
as 3:2023cv01318
Plaintiff:
Anthony Nichols
Defendant:
AUSTIN BRIDGE & ROAD, LP and Austin Bridge & Road LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Marbley v. Teamster Local 988
as 23-20252
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joshua Marbley
Defendant / Appellee:
Teamster Local 988, Michael Offord, Private and Professional Capacity, Michael Honer, Private and Professional Capacity and others
Sutton v. Adams et al
as 2:2023cv02253
Plaintiff:
Rick Sutton and Rick M Sutton
Defendant:
Jack Adams and Maison Royale, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 a Removal of Claims Related to Bankruptcy Cases
Garza v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Brandon Garza
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
