Cases 101 - 110 of 102,664
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
King v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00434
Petitioner:
Christopher T King
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Garcia v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv01740
Plaintiff:
Andrew Garcia, Jr.
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01749
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rector v. Director, TDCJ ***CASE TRANSFERRED TO SDTX, HOUSTON DIVISION***
as 4:2024cv01741
Plaintiff:
Lonnie H Rector, Jr
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lester v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00413
Petitioner:
Timmy Heath Lester
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Jefferson County Sheriff
as 1:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
Thomas C. Baker
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stanfield v. Jones et al
as 6:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Timothy Stanfield and Randy Jones
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier and Unknown Loosier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ramirez v. USA
as 4:2024cv00412
Petitioner:
Hector Moises Andrade Ramirez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
