Cases 101 - 110 of 34,058
Kevin Tate v. Rob Bonta et al
as 5:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tate
Defendant:
Rob Bonta and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hemphill v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
Dejon Hemphill
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino, City of San Bernardino and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Irvine et al v. State of California et al
as 3:2024cv01049
Plaintiff:
Parmindar Irvine and Michael Irvine
Defendant:
State of California, County of Contra Costa and City of Richmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adolfo Rodriguez v. Orange County Probation Department
as 8:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Rodriguez
Defendant:
Orange County Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pim Shih v. Mitsuwa Corporation
as 2:2024cv03134
Plaintiff:
Pim Shih
Defendant:
Mitsuwa Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Markson v. County of Fresno et al
as 1:2024at00320
Plaintiff:
Curtis Markson
Defendant:
County of Fresno and Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harel Talasazan v. Robert M. Farrell et al
as 2:2024cv01356
Defendant:
Attorney Poonam Patidar, Robert M. Farrell, Maria R. Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Harel Talasazan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rojas Martinez et al v. Clake LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
Orquidea Rojas Martinez and Ricardo Ruiz
Defendant:
Clake LLC and Eddi Matti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Richard Lawless v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Richard R. Lawless
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Elbaum v. Google, Inc.
as 4:2024cv02294
Plaintiff:
Saul Elbaum
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
