Cases 101 - 110 of 6,746
Vowels v. State of Kentucky et al
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Lesley Vowels
Defendant:
State of Kentucky, Gene Snyder Federal Building, United States District Court West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Farrow v. Vanceburg
as 0:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Janet Farrow
Defendant:
City of Vanceburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morgan v. Hopkinsville Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
DeWayne A. Morgan
Defendant:
Hopkinsville Police Department, Major Ceasar Sierra, Captain Todd DeArmond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Adcock v. Hopkins County Board Of Education et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Kaylie Adcock
Defendant:
Hopkins County Board Of Education and Elizabeth Barlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
