Cases 101 - 110 of 4,216
Paciorek v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
as 2:2023cv00904
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Michael Paciorek
Defendant:
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paciorek v. Utah County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00906
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Michael Paciorek
Defendant:
Utah County Jail and Mike Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Bidwell v. Salt Lake City
as 2:2023cv00888
Plaintiff:
David Bidwell
Defendant:
Salt Lake City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kuczmanski v. Obray et al
as 2:2023cv00879
Plaintiff:
Jeana Kuczmanski
Defendant:
Diana Obray, Deborah Wood, Patricia Hartzell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. Tec Management,LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Faith Edwards
Defendant:
Tec Management,LLC and Patriot Pointe, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Clark v. Epps et al
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Eric Douglas Clark
Defendant:
James Ray Epps and Michael Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Maynard et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Andrew Taylor
Defendant:
FNU Maynard, FNU Wilson, Blair Wardle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
