Cases 101 - 110 of 39,561
Veal v. Forsyth County Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Samuel David Veal
Defendant:
Forsyth County Detention Center, Forsyth County Road Deputies, Forsyth County Deputies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Peachtree City P.D. et al
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Terell Owens
Defendant:
Peachtree City P.D. and Fayette County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. Catoosa County Sheriff's Department Detention Center
as 4:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Jessica Lynn Bates
Defendant:
Catoosa County Sheriff's Department Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. JEFFERSON et al
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
TYRONE GREEN
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN JEFFERSON, DEPUTY WARDEN JONES, DEPUTY WARDEN McDaniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pace v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv01557
Plaintiff:
Lyndon Fitzgerald Pace
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Christopher Carr and Shawn Emmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Quint Lavert Evans
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sifuenter v. State of Georgia
as 5:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Roel Sifuentes
Defendant:
State of Georgia and Odum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAN v. DOE
as 5:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
SALEEBAN ISSE ADAN
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ADAN v. DOE
as 5:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
SALEEBAN ISSE ADAN
Respondent:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sifuenter v. State of Georgia
as 4:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Roel Sifuenter and Gerardo Roel Sifuentes
Defendant:
State of Georgia and Odum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
