Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Cases 101 - 110 of 15,537
Mann v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05032
Plaintiff: Lyndsey Mann
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mullins v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00100
Plaintiff: Jeremy Patrick Mullins
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Woodworth v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00099
Plaintiff: Frank Woodworth
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Riach v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03045
Plaintiff: Aaron Riach
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Murry v. Caughron et al
as 4:2024cv05019
Plaintiff: Roy Howard Murry
Defendant: Desaraye Caughron, Derek Anderson, Gabriel Lapsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 2:2024cv00048
Plaintiff: Marie Walker
Defendant: State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Lopez v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05016
Plaintiff: Mario Lopez
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rivera v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00028
Plaintiff: Orlando Rivera
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dimas v. Warner
as 1:2024cv03044
Petitioner: Ricardo Ochoa Dimas
Respondent: Jack Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Briceno v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff: Danielle Briceno
Defendant: Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?