Cases 101 - 110 of 5,935
James v. Lovett
as 3:2023cv00257
Petitioner:
Calvin James
Respondent:
Current custodian S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stutler v. FCI McDowell
as 3:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Aric Stutler
Respondent:
FCI McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Lovett
as 5:2023cv00370
Petitioner:
Durrell Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Stanley Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martin v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
Randall C. Martin
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Byas v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00355
Petitioner:
Deontay Byas
Respondent:
Warden Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mayes v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00358
Petitioner:
Keejuan Mayes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gottfried v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Michael Gottfried
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Correctional Officer C. Pacholke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brown v. USA
as 3:2023cv00253
Petitioner:
Deshawn Anthony Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Fletcher v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Fletcher
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simons v. Wexford Health
as 3:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Gary Lynn Simons
Defendant:
Wexford Health, Andie (Head Nurse) NCRJ and Jane/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
