Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 111 - 120 of 4,728
Borrego Community Health Foundation v. Hebets et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01056
Defendant: Diana Thompson, Karen Hebets, Mikia Wallis and others
Plaintiff: Borrego Community Health Foundation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lizama et al v. W6LS, Inc. et al
as 2:2023at01171
Plaintiff: Jonathan Lizama and Christine Correia
Defendant: W6LS, Inc. d/b/a WITHU Loans,, Caliber Financial Services, Inc. and Clarity Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hunt v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv04953
Plaintiff: Justin Hunt
Defendant: Meta Platforms, Inc., Google, LLC, Alphabet, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kathleen Wilkinson, et al v. Facebook, Inc.
as 22-16889
Not Classified By Court: In re: FACEBOOK SIMULATED CASINO-STYLE GAMES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant: KATHLEEN WILKINSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, NANCY URBANCZYK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LAURA PERKINSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation
Amicus Curiae: COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION and others
In re: Kathleen Wilkinson, et al v. Facebook, Inc.
as 22-16888
Not Classified By Court: In re: FACEBOOK SIMULATED CASINO-STYLE GAMES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: KATHLEEN WILKINSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, NANCY URBANCZYK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LAURA PERKINSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant: FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation
Amicus Curiae: COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION and others
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, et al v. Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv07604
Plaintiff: MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, a Delaware Series Limited Liability Company, MSPA Claims 1, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC, a Delaware Series Limited Liability Company and others
Defendant: Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc., Caring Voice Coalition, Inc., an Idaho non-profit corporation, Adira Foundation, a Virginia non-profit corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Fox v. Velocity Solar Power, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01319
Plaintiff: Erik Fox
Defendant: Velocity Solar Power, Inc., Velocity Solar Power Installations, LLC, Darin Dowd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Seattle Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01423
Plaintiff: Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant: Seattle Police Department, Kathleen O'Toole, Lisa O'Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Amazon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01425
Plaintiff: Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant: Amazon, Jeffrey Preston Jorgensen, Andrew R Jassy and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Warner Music Group et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01424
Plaintiff: Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant: Warner Music Group, Elana Caplan and Angela Caplan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?