Cases 111 - 120 of 10,354
CLEMENT v. GARLAND
as 1:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA CLEMENT and HH EMPRESS QUEEN CHRISTINA LOCS IS OUR ARTIFACT OF FAITH
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
REEVE v. MONEX INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
REBECCA REEVE
Defendant:
MONEX INC, JOHN GREEN and GREGORY LYUMKIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
SEDITA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00900
Plaintiff:
GIUSEPPE SEDITA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK GARLAND and CHRISTOPHER WRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
CHAMBERS v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2024cv00897
Plaintiff:
CARISSA CHAMBERS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ADENARIWO et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
ADE ADENARIWO, THERESA BROOKS, DENINE EDMONDS and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALKER v. NATIONAL PROPERTY BOARD et al
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WALKER
Defendant:
NATIONAL PROPERTY BOARD, ANDREAS TEN BERGE, URLIKA FRANK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
