Cases 121 - 130 of 2,082
Collymore v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2022cv11742
Plaintiff:
Steven Shelby Collymore
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Sgt Darymple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noel v. Orfanello et al
as 1:2022cv11494
Plaintiff:
Arnold A Noel
Defendant:
Judge Mary A. Orfanello and Kathleen A Reagan, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
LoRusso v. DeSantis
as 1:2022cv11824
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony LoRusso
Defendant:
Governor Ron DeSantis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fruzzetti v. Easton Police Officers
as 1:2022cv11330
Plaintiff:
John Lee Fruzzetti and Lee Fruzzetti
Defendant:
Easton Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yarde v. Mici et al
as 1:2022cv11395
Plaintiff:
David Yarde
Defendant:
Carol A. Mici, Steven Kenneway, Nestor Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Currie et al
as 1:2022cv11321
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Defendant:
Haley Currie, Dennis P McManus, Robert J. Creedon, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wooten et al v. Gelb
as 1:2022cv11491
Plaintiff:
Desean Wooten and April Wooten
Defendant:
Bruce Gelb, Pentagon and The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gassew v. Cutillar
as 1:2022cv11621
Plaintiff:
John Gassew
Defendant:
Dr Dean Cutillar and Federal Medical Center Devens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 4:2022cv40101
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Porter
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Worcester Recovery Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lugo v. Veliz et al
as 1:2022cv11211
Plaintiff:
Luke Lugo
Defendant:
M.D Jorge Veliz, George Vintoile, Osvaldo Vadel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
