Cases 121 - 130 of 551
United States of America v. Currency
as 2:2016cv00713
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Currency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. One Remington Arms .22 caliber rifle
as 1:2016cv00098
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
One Remington Arms .22 caliber rifle
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Currency
as 2:2016cv00343
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Currency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. $120,435
as 2:2016cv00156
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. One Glock et al
as 1:2016cv00024
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
One Glock, One Mossberg 835, One Oviedo and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
United States of America v. $7,050.00 in United States Currency
as 2:2015cv00958
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$7,050.00 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Erica Gaston
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $2,929.50, more or less, in U.S. Currency
as 1:2015cv00596
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$2,929.50, more or less, in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
United States of America v. $504,135.00 in United States Currency (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG2)
as 2:2015cv00800
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$504,135.00 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Curtis Earl Pope, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $50,745.00, more or less, in U.S. Currency
as 1:2015cv00467
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$50,745.00, more or less, in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Devin Lilly
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. United States Currency et al
as 2:2015cv01632
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.