Cases 131 - 140 of 157,216
Swain v. Murray et al
as 4:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Antonio Swain
Defendant:
Billy Murray, Brown, Phillip Barnard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle v. Headley et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dentray Battle
Defendant:
Joseph Headley and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hatcher v. Griffin et al
as 3:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Mark Eugene Hatcher
Defendant:
Griffin, Ballew, Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLESKE v. CHILDS et al
as 4:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE WALLESKE
Defendant:
LARRY CHILDS, RONTERRIOUS WILLIAMS, JOHN DOES 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval)
as 3:2024cv00461
Petitioner:
Victor V. Reed
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steelman v. Steelman et al
as 6:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
Christopher Steelman
Defendant:
James Steelman, Tresa Steelman, Colombo Mummers P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Camilo Ruiz v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv60773
Plaintiff:
Andres Camilo Ruiz
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BAILEY v. THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES BAILEY, III
Defendant:
THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, INSPECTOR GENERAL, ANGELA GORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raymond Claudio v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11472
Petitioner:
RAYMOND CLAUDIO
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Kelly v. King
as 2:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Jessica Kelly
Defendant:
Matthew King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
