Cases 141 - 150 of 3,670
SNEAD v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
BENNIE MAE SNEAD
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN DESHAWN JONES and DOE JOHN AND JANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
JONES v. GTR ENTERPRISES INC et al
as 7:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
DERRELL JONES
Defendant:
GTR ENTERPRISES INC, FRANKLIN R. ROLLINS, JR., CALEB LINDBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BARNETT v. CITY OF WARWICK, GEORGIA et al
as 1:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
ALICE LANELLE BARNETT
Defendant:
CITY OF WARWICK GEORGIA, APRIL MORRIS and THOMAS STEWART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRANTHAM v. CITY OF WARWICK GEORGIA et al
as 1:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
KAYLA RAYNE GRANTHAM
Defendant:
CITY OF WARWICK GEORGIA, APRIL MORRIS and THOMAS STEWART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
