Cases 151 - 160 of 6,401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv40102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rios v. Stevenson et al
as 1:2023cv11571
Plaintiff:
Ray L. Rios
Defendant:
Anthony Stevenson, Dean Grey, Michael Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv40101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Duarte v. United States District Court et al
as 1:2023cv11933
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Duarte
Defendant:
United States District Court, Clerk Manager, Sheriff Patrick W. McDermott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monteiro v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2023cv11609
Petitioner:
Keon Monteiro
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. Alves
as 1:2023cv11822
Plaintiff:
Omar Bonner
Defendant:
Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kostka v. Rodriguez
as 1:2023cv11428
Plaintiff:
Timothy Kostka
Respondent:
Michael Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Figueroa Garcia v. Zodak
as 1:2023cv11432
Petitioner:
Werner Figueroa Garcia
Respondent:
Scott Zodak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hem v. Suffolk County House of Correction
as 1:2023cv11767
Petitioner:
Timmy Hem
Respondent:
Suffolk County House of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
