Cases 151 - 160 of 12,089
Salmen v. Terronez et al
as 3:2023cv02054
Plaintiff:
Justin Salmen
Defendant:
L. Terronez and Blanding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01843
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Portluck v. Unknown Defendants
as 3:2023cv01897
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ernest Portluck
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Job v. USA
as 3:2023cv02189
Petitioner:
Travis Job
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Stephenson v. Stillman et al
as 3:2023cv01931
Defendant:
William Stephenson, Allen Stillman and Melissa Bagwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Grogan v. People of the State of California et al
as 3:2023cv01857
Plaintiff:
Daniel Grogan
Defendant:
People of the State of California, Robert Haberer and Abbigail Broines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. County of San Diego, et al
as 3:2023cv01819
Plaintiff:
William Howard Ward
Defendant:
County of San Diego, Undersheriff and Acting Sheriff Kelly Martinez,, Does 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Sheriff Kelley Martinez et al
as 3:2023cv02024
Petitioner:
Pedro Rodriguez
Respondent:
Sheriff Kelley Martinez and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02185
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Zamora v. USA
as 3:2023cv02160
Petitioner:
Ashley Elizabeth Zamora
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
