Cases 151 - 160 of 1,021
Cedar Rapids Electrical Apprenticeship Training and Educational Trust v. Ehret
as 1:2018xc00002
Plaintiff:
Cedar Rapids Electrical Apprenticeship Training and Educational Trust
Defendant:
Chad Michael Ehret
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Cedar Rapids Electrical Apprenticeship Training and Educational Trust v. Ehret
as 1:2018cv00001
Plaintiff:
Cedar Rapids Electrical Apprenticeship Training and Educational Trust
Defendant:
Chad Michael Ehret
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Fagan v. Martin
as 2:2017cv01037
Plaintiff:
Angela Raylene Fagan
Defendant:
Joshua Jeffrey Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11603
Sparling v. Rockwell Collins, Inc
as 1:2017cv00137
Plaintiff:
Patti J Sparling
Defendant:
Rockwell Collins, Inc , Anthony J Carbone, Chris A Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Ladwig v. Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2017cv00135
Plaintiff:
Gregory T Ladwig
Defendant:
Department of Transportation, Linn County Sheriff, Linn County Clerk of Court and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv03093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Marchese v. Rockwell Collins Inc et al
as 1:2017cv00128
Plaintiff:
Mary Marchese
Defendant:
Rockwell Collins, Inc, Anthony J Carbone, Chris A Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Heinly v. Rockwell Collins Inc et al
as 1:2017cv00127
Plaintiff:
Matthew D Heinly
Defendant:
Rockwell Collins, Inc, Robert K Ortberg, David Lilley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Davids v. United States Department of Agriculture
as 3:2017cv03091
Plaintiff:
Karen G Davids
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 6999
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
