Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 2,851
Donald Higgs v. New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1712
Plaintiff: DONALD D. HIGGS
Defendant: NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, VICTORIA L. KUHN, Esq., NJ DOC Commissioner, M. CHERY, Corrections Officer and others
Carl Bell v. Kim Ardery, et al
as 24-1373
Plaintiff: CARL EDWARD BELL
Defendant: KIM ARDERY, Medical Care Supervisor/CHCA at SCI- Benner Township, MORRIS HOUSER, Superintendent, GEORGE LITTLE, Secretary of Department of Corrections and others
In re: Christopher Oliver
as 24-1688
Damile Mitchell v. Earl Jones, et al
as 24-1308
Plaintiff: DAMILE Q. MITCHELL
Defendant: EARL J. JONES, Deputy Superintendent for Facility, BRIAN FLINCHBAUGH, Deputy Superintendent for Centralized Services, CAMPBELL, Captain at SCI-Albion and others
Jeremiah Moore v. C. Minerva, et al
as 24-1669
Plaintiff: JEREMIAH MOORE
Defendant: C. MINERVA, Corrections Officer, SGT. BAKER and CHRISTOPHER PETTINE
Sheng-Wen Cheng v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1645
Plaintiff: SHENG-WEN CHENG
Defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alvin Washington v. Bregman, et al
as 24-1666
Plaintiff: ALVIN WASHINGTON
Defendant: CORRECTIONS OFFICER BREGMAN and SGT. F. MCCLELLAN
Jasper Frazier v. Victoria Kuhn, et al
as 24-1620
Plaintiff: JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant: VICTORIA L. KUHN, Acting Commissioner, PATRICK NOGAN, Administrator, ANTHONY GONGI, Association Administrator and others
John Alexander v. B. Myers, et al
as 24-1239
Plaintiff: JOHN ALEXANDER
Defendant: B. MYERS, Corrections Lieutenant- SCI Smithfield, SPECK, Corrections Lieutenant SCI-Smithfield, WISER, Corrections Lieutenant SCI-Smithfield and others
Keith Brown v. Mary Monsalud, et al
as 24-1555
Plaintiff: KEITH STANLEY BROWN
Defendant: DR. MARY JOY MONSALUD, DR. NEWTON and KAREN HOLLY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?