Cases 11 - 20 of 9,274
Boles v. Fisher et al.
as 3:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
Reno Marcus Boles
Defendant:
Detective Richard B. Fisher and Toledo Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00792
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hillman v. Gill et al.
as 3:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Brandon John Hillman
Defendant:
Joseph N. Gill, Tayler Glass, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
A.S. v. Mapleton Local School District et al.
as 1:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Mapleton Local School District, Mapleton Local School District Board of Education, Scott Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Randleman v. Firelands Habitat for Humanity, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Tonya L. Randleman
Defendant:
Firelands Habitat for Humanity, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Shank v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00745
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Shank
Defendant:
Shelby W. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
