Cases 11 - 20 of 17,202
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01188
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brown v. State of Maryland
as 1:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Jermall Brown
Defendant:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hinton v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01212
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hinton
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrick v. Dean, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
Larnell E. Hendrick
Defendant:
Robert Dean, Jr., Lieutnant Ahmed, Dr. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. USA - 2255
as 1:2024cv01228
Petitioner:
Jordale King
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Horton v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv01231
Respondent:
Jeffrey Nines, State of Maryland and Ricky Horton
Petitioner:
Troydrick Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hammock v. Shellenberger et al
as 1:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
Terrence Edward Hammock
Defendant:
Scott Shellenberger, States Attorney Michael Fuller and States Attorney Michelle Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mazyck v. Weber et al
as 1:2024cv01182
Petitioner:
Troy Mazyck
Respondent:
Warden of W.C.I. Ronald Shane Weber and Anthony Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darling v. Webber et al
as 1:2024cv01183
Petitioner:
Deshaune D. Darling
Respondent:
Webber and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zeller v. Reese et al
as 1:2024cv01064
Plaintiff:
David Zeller
Defendant:
Ms. Reese and YesCare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
