Cases 11 - 20 of 288
Oien v. North Dakota, State of
as 3:2023cv00066
Petitioner:
Jason Wayne Oien
Respondent:
North Dakota, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wickham v. Foster et al
as 1:2023cv00057
Petitioner:
Corey Michael Wickham
Respondent:
Warden Steve Foster and Warden Shaun Fode
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bridges v. Director of Corrections
as 1:2023cv00035
Petitioner:
John Clark Bridges
Respondent:
Director of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Happel v. Pringle
as 3:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Tyson Happel
Respondent:
North Dakota, State of and Chad Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Happel v. Pringle
as 3:2023cv00046
Petitioner:
Tyson Happel
Respondent:
North Dakota, State of and Chad Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGinnis v. Slayer et al
as 1:2023cv00018
Petitioner:
Neil Adams McGinnis
Respondent:
Warden James Slayer, ND DOCR, Colby Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brickle-Hicks v. Sayler
as 1:2023cv00017
Petitioner:
Morris Jerome Brickle-Hicks
Respondent:
James Sayler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ali v. Sayler
as 1:2023cv00002
Petitioner:
Abdulrahman Ibrahim Ali
Respondent:
James Sayler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bridges v. Director of Corrections
as 1:2022cv00213
Petitioner:
John Clark Bridges
Respondent:
Director of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bridges v. Director of Corrections
as 1:2022cv00177
Petitioner:
John Clark Bridges
Respondent:
Director of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
