Cases 11 - 20 of 80,561
Taylor v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02154
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Taylor
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rehbein v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02161
Plaintiff:
Thomas Henry Rehbein, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wonser v. Norman et al
as 2:2024cv02160
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wonser
Defendant:
Charles L. Norman, Andy Wilson and Thomas Stickrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Isham v. Richardson et al
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ralph E. Isham
Defendant:
Chief Craig Richardson, Sergeant Kenneth Lloyd, Scott Kinderdine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Loper v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00140
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Catherine Loper
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Racer v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02159
Plaintiff:
Derrick Racer
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gerrard v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02118
Plaintiff:
Lisa Gerrard
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Haywood et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02122
Plaintiff:
Lakecia Haywood and Elijah Ashley Haywood, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02127
Plaintiff:
Kevin Martin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edwards v. Manning et al
as 1:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Edwards
Defendant:
Jay Manning and Davyne Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
