Cases 11 - 20 of 7,276
Campbell v. Beal et al
as 1:2024cv01054
Plaintiff:
Robert Duane Campbell
Defendant:
Steve Beal and Junior Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trujillo v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02161
Petitioner:
Paul Trujillo
Respondent:
Warden Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Driskell v. Baker et al
as 2:2024cv02183
Plaintiff:
Tommy L. Driskell
Defendant:
Arkeycia Baker, Endrea Howard and Kathy Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pankey v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01102
Petitioner:
Jaycent Pankey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Payne v. Whisman et al
as 1:2024cv01061
Plaintiff:
Cesare Payne
Defendant:
Candace Whisman, Camala Morris, Wendy Pruett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clinton v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02171
Petitioner:
Gregory Keith Clinton
Respondent:
Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROBERTSON v. Shelby County Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv02290
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LASHEA ROBERTSON and Ronnie Lashea Williams
Defendant:
Shelby County Division of Corrections, Anthony Alexander, Mayor Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02292
Petitioner:
Terry Reed
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gomez-Castro v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02297
Petitioner:
Luis Gomez-Castro
Respondent:
C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Simmons v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01101
Petitioner:
Adam Lee Simmons
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
