General Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 11 - 20 of 4,797
Farmer v. Parris
as 3:2024cv00563
Petitioner: Keith Lemont Farmer
Respondent: Mike Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Clum v. Harrison We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv02172
Petitioner: David Clum, Jr.
Respondent: C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nelson v. Wardlow
as 4:2024cv00036
Petitioner: BILLY JOE NELSON
Respondent: JERRY WARDLOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elnour v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02284
Petitioner: Mohamed Elnour
Respondent: C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Coleman v. FCI Milan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00102
Petitioner: Rashaud L. Coleman
Respondent: FCI Milan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scott v. Eller
as 4:2024cv00024
Petitioner: Malik Scott
Respondent: Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keene v. Phillips
as 2:2024cv00067
Petitioner: Mario Keene
Respondent: Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caraway v. Fitz
as 2:2024cv02263
Petitioner: Romilus Caraway
Respondent: Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burton v. Illinois Dept of Corrections Parole Board
as 2:2024cv02259
Petitioner: Stephon Depaul Burton
Respondent: Illinois Dept of Corrections Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wright v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00217
Petitioner: Darcel D. Wright
Respondent: State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?