Cases 21 - 30 of 8,423
Khan v. PNC Bank
as 5:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Khalid K. Khan
Defendant:
PNC Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WINSLOW v. LONNIE BUSH REAL ESTATE, LLC
as 1:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
WILLIS R. WINSLOW
Defendant:
LONNIE BUSH REAL ESTATE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Defenders of Wildlife et al v. US Forest Service et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Defenders of Wildlife, MountainTrue, Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
US Forest Service, US Fish and Wildlife Service, James Melonas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
SAM RESTAURANTS, INC. v. UNITED SUGAR PRODUCERS & REFINERS COOPERATIVE et al
as 1:2024cv00326
Defendant:
UNITED SUGAR PRODUCERS & REFINERS COOPERATIVE, UNITED SUGARS CORPORATION, AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SAM RESTAURANTS, INC on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as CAROLINA'S DINER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Industrial Services Group, Inc. v. Dobson et al
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Industrial Services Group, Inc. doing business as Universal Blastco
Defendant:
Josh Dobson and Jennifer Haigwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Colon v. Straight Marketing LLC
as 3:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Andrew Colon
Defendant:
Straight Marketing LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
UPADHAYAY v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
JHAPENDRA UPADHAYAY
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, DIRECTOR CHRISTOPHER HEFFRON and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
