Cases 21 - 30 of 5,658
Gallop v. Segal
as 0:2024cv01357
Petitioner:
Teresa Gallop
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bahtuoh et al v. White et al
as 0:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dineaa Bahtuoh and Derrick DaSean Holliday
Defendant:
Jeffrey White and Kathryn Halverson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv00637
Petitioner:
Micheal Delgado Martinez and Michael Delgado Martinez
Respondent:
Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tennin v. Torres et al
as 0:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Todd Tennin
Defendant:
Torres, Dan Minke, Jessica Fergen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shortymacknifisent v. Schnell et al
as 0:2024cv01280
Petitioner:
Archbishop Kingpimp Shortymacknifisent
Respondent:
Paul Schnell, William Bolin and Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Belinger et al
as 0:2024cv01303
Plaintiff:
Arron Scott King, Sr
Defendant:
Belinger, MD.O.C. and Keith Ellingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Hennipen County Jail et al
as 0:2024cv01296
Plaintiff:
Arron Scott King, Sr
Defendant:
Hennipen County Jail and Ogustine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dahir v. Bolin
as 0:2024cv01304
Petitioner:
Mohammed Abdi Dahir
Respondent:
William Bolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Traylor v. Minnesota Dept of Corrections et al
as 0:2024cv01275
Plaintiff:
Rayco DelShaune Traylor
Defendant:
Minnesota Dept of Corrections, Binkley, Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Becerra v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv01249
Petitioner:
Erik Becerra
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
