Cases 31 - 40 of 1,088
Driscoll II v. Leaf
as 1:2023cv12835
Plaintiff:
James M. Driscoll II
Defendant:
Robert Leaf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
HERBERT v. UNISHIP BANKING
as 1:2023cv00418
Plaintiff:
KRISTINA HERBERT
Defendant:
UNISHIP BANKING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Toth v. Everly Well, Inc., et al
as 23-1727
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOYCE TOTH
Defendant / Appellee:
EVERLY WELL, INC. and EVERLY HEALTH, INC.
Joseph v. The University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
as 4:2023cv40120
Plaintiff:
Alana Joseph
Defendant:
The University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Valiente v. Maximus, Inc.
as 1:2023cv12487
Plaintiff:
Heriberto Valiente
Defendant:
Maximus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Sevelitte v. Ross et al
as 1:2023cv12471
Plaintiff:
Renee Sevelitte
Defendant:
Valerie Ross, ESQ., Joshua Garick, ESQ. and Robyn A. Caplis-Sevelitte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Lane v. Brigham and Woman Hospital et al
as 1:2023cv11958
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Brigham and Woman Hospital, Kaplan George Wecelley Becen, Jackie Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
LoGiudici v. Progress Software Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv11916
Plaintiff:
Dana LoGiudici
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation, Pension Benefit Information LLC d/b/a PBI Research Services and Pension Benefit Information LLC doing business as PBI Research Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
AQUINO, et al. v. MCDONALD
as 1:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
HANNA AQUINO and SUSAN ENGLAR
Defendant:
MATTHEW T MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Gary et al v. Dynatrace, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv11673
Plaintiff:
Alyssa Gary and Marla DeFoort
Defendant:
Dynatrace, Inc. and Dynatrace, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
