Cases 31 - 40 of 722
BECKNER v. UPMC SOMERSET
as 3:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
JULIA BECKNER
Defendant:
UPMC SOMERSET
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
FERREE v. CHEMIMAGE CORPORATION
as 2:2023cv01565
Plaintiff:
MELIA FERREE
Defendant:
CHEMIMAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
BRUNNER v. LEHIGH VALLEY CHILDREN'S CENTERS, INC. et al
as 5:2023cv03498
Plaintiff:
BRANDY BRUNNER
Defendant:
LEHIGH VALLEY CHILDREN'S CENTERS, INC. and KAREN KEMMERER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Zimmerman v. T-Force Freight, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01447
Plaintiff:
Angela Zimmerman
Defendant:
T-Force Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
WING et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE et al
as 2:2023cv02844
Plaintiff:
BRET WING and SHARON JERMANY
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, MELISSA SAULS, MELISSA MCGRATH and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
WILLIAMS v. PROSPECT CCMC, LLC
as 2:2023cv02467
Plaintiff:
KIA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PROSPECT CCMC, LLC doing business as CROZER CHESTER MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
WALTERS v. DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2023cv02887
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH WALTERS
Defendant:
DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
TURACY v. DB PIPE, LLC
as 2:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
DONALD TURACY
Defendant:
DB PIPE, LLC doing business as DURA BOND PIPE I
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
STOUFFER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
MARK STOUFFER
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
GRIFFIN v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING
as 5:2023cv02377
Plaintiff:
ERICA GRIFFIN
Defendant:
PENSKE TRUCK LEASING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
