Cases 31 - 40 of 93,668
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Baskerville v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Baskerville
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Essex House Limited Partnership v. Winn Management Company
as 1:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
Essex House Limited Partnership
Defendant:
Winn Management Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Burandt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
Corliss O. Burandt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
TAMARIS (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED v. AMPPRAGMATICPLAY.COM et al
as 1:2024cv00748
Plaintiff:
TAMARIS (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED
Defendant:
AMPPRAGMATICPLAY.COM, ASIA-PRAGMATICPLAY.COM, CHEATPRAGMATICPLAY.COM and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Mosier v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Kevin V. Mosier
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
