Cases 31 - 40 of 29,233
James Morrison v. County of Yellowstone, et al
as 23-35444
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MORRISON
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF YELLOWSTONE, SCOTT TWITO, YELLOWSTONE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Harold Griffin v. J. Hodges, et al
as 23-55569
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAROLD GRIFFIN
Defendant / Appellee:
J. HODGES, Chief Physician Dr., R. BARENCHI, Chief Physician : Dr, D. AMORY,, Dr.: M.D and others
Steve Garner v. M. Gutierrez
as 23-15937
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVE J. GARNER
Respondent / Appellee:
M. GUTIERREZ, Warden
Richard Thompson v. Scott Blum
as 23-15947
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD WAYNE THOMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT BLUM, Prosecutor
James Tooley v. Joshua Highberger
as 23-35503
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES CHARLES TOOLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
JOSHUA HIGHBERGER
Lacey Sivak v. Jay Christensen
as 23-35453
Petitioner / Appellant:
LACEY MARK SIVAK
Respondent / Appellee:
JAY CHRISTENSEN, Warden
Lance Williams v. R. Farley, et al
as 23-55567
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANCE ELLIOT WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
R. FARLEY, Correctional Officer, D. AREBALO, Lieutenant Corrections Officer, individual and official capacity, M. WILLIAMS, Correctional Counselor Two, individual and official capacity and others
Edward Steiner v. Brent Kempster, et al
as 23-35445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD J. STEINER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRENT KEMPSTER, Officer, La Push Police Department, NICOLE WHEELER, Cashier, Lonesome Creek Store and Resort and APRIL BLAIR-PULLEN, Cashier, Lonesome Creek Store and Resort
Appellee:
QUILEUTE TRIBE
USA v. Yosvany Ruzlopez
as 23-15997
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
YOSVANY RUZLOPEZ
Robin Fahr v. Timothy Johnson, et al
as 23-15905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBIN JOY FAHR
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRITTNIE SOSA, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, D. REVERE, Unknown; Assistant Deputy Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
