Cases 31 - 40 of 8,476
WISHON v. JACKSON STATE PRISON
as 5:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
SETH AXLEY WISHON
Defendant:
JACKSON STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Harmon et al
as 3:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Gregory Simpson
Defendant:
Investigator Harmon and Ms. Flemming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALSTON v. COASTAL STATE PRISON et al
as 4:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Dennis Alston
Defendant:
Coastal State Prison, JOHN AND OR JANE DOE and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Detherage v. Triplett et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Joshua Detherage
Defendant:
John E. Triplett and Elizabeth N. Slater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grable v. Oliver et al
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Felenthean Grable
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Andrew McFarlane and Veronica Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Vlasenko
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Morieo Austin
Defendant:
Dr. Vlasenko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wishon v. Jackson G.D.C.P.
as 4:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Seth Axley Wishon
Defendant:
Jackson G.D.C.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Inmates of Clayton County et al v. Allen et al
as 1:2024cv01347
Plaintiff:
Inmates of Clayton County and Antonio Darnell Johnson
Defendant:
Levon Allen and Clayton County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Chamber et al
as 3:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Douglas DeSean Logan
Defendant:
Warden Brian Chamber, Dr. Adodele Ayedun and Deputy Warden Chabara Bragg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Chambers et al
as 3:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Douglas DeSean Logan
Defendant:
Warden Brian Chambers, Chabara Bragg, Ms. Messier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
