Cases 31 - 40 of 20,393
Armendariz v. Cozi Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Reina Armendariz
Defendant:
Cozi Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
M&H Metal Specialties Inc v. Sheet Metal Workers Nat'l Pension Fd
as 3:2024cv00943
Plaintiff:
M&H Metal Specialties Inc
Defendant:
Sheet Metal Workers Nat'l Pension Fd
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Greene v. Lawrence A. Shafron, M.D., P.A.
as 4:2024cv00328
Defendant:
Lawrence A. Shafron, M.D., P.A. and Advanced Eye Care Center
Plaintiff:
Lauren Greene
Cox v. Metro Video Services LLC
as 4:2024cv01392
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Cox
Defendant:
Metro Video Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Valenzuela v. Ghost City Tours of Texas, LLC. et al
as 5:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Valenzuela
Defendant:
Ghost City Tours of Texas, LLC. and Ghost City Tours Holding, LLC.
Alvarez v. MG Building Materials, LTD
as 5:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Johnny Alvarez
Defendant:
MG Building Materials, LTD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Lafleur et al v. Razor Oilfield Services LLC
as 6:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Shaphan Lafleur
Defendant:
Razor Oilfield Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Diffa v. Daikin Comfort Technologies, Manufacturing, LP
as 4:2024cv01377
Plaintiff:
Weniboebi Diffa
Defendant:
DAIKIN COMFORT TECHNOLOGIES, MANUFACTURING L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Conley v. Dennard et al
as 1:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Natalie Conley
Defendant:
Brad Dennard, Michael DeWyre, Patty Trujillo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Burton v. University Of Houston
as 4:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Martinique Burton
Defendant:
University Of Houston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
