Cases 31 - 40 of 297
Vacanti v. 2800 Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00038
Defendant:
Miguel Ramirez, 2800 Corporation doing business as Bottoms Up Lounge and Mike Ramirez
Plaintiff:
Amanda Vacanti
Guy v. DMG Installations, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00331
Defendant:
DMG Installations, Inc., Mediacom Communications Corp. and Central Communications, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Guy
U.S. Department of Labor v. Cazarezz Corporation et al
as 4:2020cv00335
Plaintiff:
U.S. Department of Labor
Defendant:
Refugio Guzman, Cazarezz Corporation doing business as Old West Mexican Restaurant and Erika Guzman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Miller v. Elliott Oil Company
as 4:2020cv00316
Plaintiff:
MILLER SHELBY and Shelby Miller
Defendant:
Elliott Oil Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Martinez Godinez et al v. G&G Moreno, Inc et al
as 3:2020cv03044
Plaintiff:
Francisco Martinez Godinez and Israel Rangel Cruz
Defendant:
Guadalupe Moreno, G & G Moreno, Inc. and G&G Moreno, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grove v. Iowa Playhouse et al
as 1:2020cv00027
Defendant:
Ronald Bergeron, Iowa Playhouse and Michael Bergeron
Plaintiff:
Andrea Grove
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Enger et al v. Thomas L Cardella & Associates, Inc
as 1:2020cv00078
Plaintiff:
Megan Enger, Sarah Infante and Ramon Lopez
Defendant:
Thomas L. Cardella & Associates, Inc. and Thomas L Cardella & Associates, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Harris v. NAPCO, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00237
Defendant:
NAPCO, Inc. and Norris Asphalt Paving Co., LC
Plaintiff:
Sean D. Harris
Adams v. Lawrence Transportation Company
as 1:2020cv00025
Defendant:
Lawrence Transportation Company
Plaintiff:
Susan Adams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hurm v. Bergman Folkers Plastic Surgery et al
as 4:2020cv00204
Plaintiff:
Sarah Hurm
Defendant:
Ronald S Bergman, Bergman Folkers Plastic Surgery and Robyn Bartholomew
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 020
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
