Cases 31 - 40 of 95,379
Crawford v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03134
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Vera Crawford
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Langer v. National Advisors Holdings, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Alex Langer
Defendant:
National Advisors Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Mosher v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Tina Marie Mosher
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Klott v. The United States of America
as 6:2024cv03133
Plaintiff:
Adam Klott
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Bedwell v. The Maples Health and Rehabilitation, LLC
as 4:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Bedwell
Defendant:
The Maples Health and Rehabilitation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Carcerano v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Giulia A. Carcerano
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Christopher et al v. JDM Equipment, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Ronald Christopher and Jolene Christopher
Defendant:
JDM Equipment, LLC, Antonio Coleman, JDM Expedite, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
