Cases 31 - 40 of 3,197
United States of America v. Approximately $86,063.00 in United States Currency et al
as 3:2024mc00039
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
Bridges et al v. Raines et al
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Shelley Bridges, Lisa Blakemore and Teresa Lukaszewicz
Defendant:
Raycen Raines, Wakpamni Lake Community Corporation, WLCC II doing business as Arrowhead Advance and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Chattooga Conservancy v The United States Forest Service, et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Chattooga Conservancy, Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife and others
Defendant:
The United States Forest Service and Troy Waskey
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Federal Trade Commission v. Novant Health, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Novant Health, Inc. and Community Health Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Official Committee of Asbestos Claimants v. Bestwall, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00285
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Buckingham et al v. Bestwall, LLC
as 3:2024cv00284
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Runge et al v. Caromont Health Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00285
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Lindsey v. USA
as 3:1999cv00133
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Holcomb v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Dean Alton Holcomb
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc., Nissan of Hendersonville, LLC., Dawud Talib Muhammad and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.